Finance & Stock Groups

Navigation: Main Page » Forum

Finance & Stock Groups Forum Index » Financial Planning » Professionally managed 401K?

Page 1 of 1

Author

Message

Guest

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:04 pm

The company I work for has a typical 401k plan with about 15-20 mutual
funds to choose from, with various concentrations (growth, value,
international, bonds, money market etc.). The selection is ok, but it
could be better. The company that handles our 401k (Nationwide) signed
up with Wilshire Associates, and are now providing what they call a
"pro" account. Getting talent like that at Wilshire to manage your
money usually takes a lot of money (like large pension plans). They
would be handling my asset allocation, rebalancing my account, etc.
They would have access to more funds then I currently have. Cost?
1.35%. Is it worth it?

I'm trying to get as much feedback before I make up my mind.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

joeDOTweinsteinATgmailDOT

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 pm

Guest

The vast majority of professional stock/fund pickers do worse than the
market over the long term, and paying them an extra 1.35% is an
extra insult. In my opinion, find one broad index fund if you have
one,
such as that covers the S&P500 or wilshire 5000, and put all your
stock allocation in it, and be happy. Put whatever portion you want
in bonds, in a broad bond index if possible. How old are you? If
young,
most if not all should be in stocks.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Default User

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 pm

Guest

49ermike@gmail.com wrote:

Quote:

There is a lot of information that is needed before any useful input
can be given. Early thoughts:

1. That's a pretty high fee for what really isn't much work beyond the
initial asset plan. Most plans make rebalancing easy, and with slicing
of contributions rebalancing isn't even necessary much of the time.
With a taxable account, a manager can stay on top of tax-loss
harvesting, but that's not applicable here. What is this person going
to do to earn that kind of fee?

2. What kind of plan is the manager going to come up with? An
index-based approach emphasizing low fees, or trying to identify hot
fund managers? This talk of "expertise" sounds somewhat ominous. What
allocation plan do you have now, and how did you come up with it?

3. How bad are your current selections, and how great are the
additional funds? Some fund names/tickers or information would be
useful.

4. Do you have significant investments outside of the 401(k)?
Portfolios should normally be considered as a whole. Part of portfolio
management is getting the right assets in tax-advantaged versus taxable
accounts. Will this manager take that into account when creating the
allocation?

Brian

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Elle

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 pm

Guest

<49ermike@gmail.com> wrote

Quote:

What other fund in particular would you like? Fifteen to 20
funds with the basic areas covered sounds plenty fine. If
there is some other fund you really want, is it possible to
invest in it via a Traditional or Roth IRA, or even taxable
account?

1.35% is steep and reduces your returns meaningful over ten
years. I would experiment with all the free online asset
allocators linked at
http://ellessite.googlepages.com/assetallocation . Note the
differences. Ask yourself, "Is this really such an exact
science?" If after reading more you think not, then do your
own asset allocation and rebalancing, once a year.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

joetaxpayer

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 pm

Guest

49ermike@gmail.com wrote:

Quote:

I trust the funds have their own expense, perhaps 1%?

The extra fee isn't likely to enhance your return beyond the expense of
the fee. Does your company match any of your deposits? What are the fees
of these funds? Are some lower than others? For my 401(k), the S&P index
is crazy low, .05%. The foreign funds, not so good. So in my allocation,
the S&P goes into the 401(k) and other sectors go into the IRA accounts.

Joe

www.blog.joetaxpayer.com

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:54 am

49ermike@gmail.com writes:

Quote:

They would have access to more funds then I currently have. Cost?
1.35%. Is it worth it?

Is that 1.35% on TOP of the mutual fund management fees
for the funds they'd use for your portfolio?

That's pretty expensive. Maybe cheap for a very small
managed account, but overall very expensive.

What funds (and at what expenses) do you have available
to you if you don't go with these guys?

--
Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

PeterL

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:11 am

Guest

On Aug 28, 2:04 am, 49erm...@gmail.com wrote:

Quote:

There are lots of free allocation tools on the web.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT The time now is Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:09 pm Finance & Stock Groups Forum Index