Navigation: Main Page » Forum
 
Web Investingadvisers.com
Finance & Stock Groups Forum Index  »  Mutual Funds  »  Not understanding "round trip" terminology; need help
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Phil
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:06 am
Guest
Okay so I started re-evaluating the funds I bought a while back and am doing
some shuffling. I have some smaller allocations in broader markets and want
to focus a little more. So I review the prospectus of each of my funds and
am confused by TCW's verbiage:

"Futher, in order to prevent excessive trading activity, the Funds limit the
number of 'round trip' transactions that a shareholder may make. A
shareholder makes a round trip by purchasing shares of a particular Fund
(through either a purchase or exchange from another Fund) and subsequently
selling shares of that Fund (through either a redumption or an exchange into
another Fund)."

Are the funds in reference to selling a fund and then buying another one *in
the same fund family?* Or is this just in general? I'm using Scottrade and
simply can't see TCW knowing if I bought a fund from another family through
Scottrade or if they communicate this through some other means.

Obviously, round-tripping only a couple times a year is no big deal because
it's not trying to time the market or trade frequently, which is probably
why they give a certain allowance of these, but it just seems silly to be
required to have downtime in between selling one security and picking
another just because of potential market timing, even between different fund
families.

--
Phil
-herb
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:54 am
Guest
Phil:

A 'round trip' is into the fund then out again. There is no reference to
other funds nor families.

-herb

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil" <nice@try.to>
Newsgroups: misc.invest.mutual-funds
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 12:06 AM
Subject: Not understanding "round trip" terminology; need help


Quote:
Okay so I started re-evaluating the funds I bought a while back and am
doing some shuffling. I have some smaller allocations in broader markets
and want to focus a little more. So I review the prospectus of each of my
funds and am confused by TCW's verbiage:

"Futher, in order to prevent excessive trading activity, the Funds limit
the number of 'round trip' transactions that a shareholder may make. A
shareholder makes a round trip by purchasing shares of a particular Fund
(through either a purchase or exchange from another Fund) and subsequently
selling shares of that Fund (through either a redumption or an exchange
into another Fund)."

Are the funds in reference to selling a fund and then buying another one
*in the same fund family?* Or is this just in general? I'm using
Scottrade and simply can't see TCW knowing if I bought a fund from another
family through Scottrade or if they communicate this through some other
means.

Obviously, round-tripping only a couple times a year is no big deal
because it's not trying to time the market or trade frequently, which is
probably why they give a certain allowance of these, but it just seems
silly to be required to have downtime in between selling one security and
picking another just because of potential market timing, even between
different fund families.

--
Phil
Jerry
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:33 pm
Guest
Fidelity defines it as selling within 30 days of a purchase. They "slap
your wrists" for 1 to 2 within a year, but freeze your entire account for 3
within a rolling year. The thing that "bugs" me about the policy is that
they count it on a last in first out basis. In other words, if one has say
100K in fund X for 10 years and buys say another 5K and then sells say 10K
within 30 days of the 5K purchase, it's counted as a round trip trade.

Jerry

"Phil" <nice@try.to> wrote in message
news:469062b9$0$24737$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote:
Okay so I started re-evaluating the funds I bought a while back and am
doing some shuffling. I have some smaller allocations in broader markets
and want to focus a little more. So I review the prospectus of each of my
funds and am confused by TCW's verbiage:

"Futher, in order to prevent excessive trading activity, the Funds limit
the number of 'round trip' transactions that a shareholder may make. A
shareholder makes a round trip by purchasing shares of a particular Fund
(through either a purchase or exchange from another Fund) and subsequently
selling shares of that Fund (through either a redumption or an exchange
into another Fund)."

Are the funds in reference to selling a fund and then buying another one
*in the same fund family?* Or is this just in general? I'm using
Scottrade and simply can't see TCW knowing if I bought a fund from another
family through Scottrade or if they communicate this through some other
means.

Obviously, round-tripping only a couple times a year is no big deal
because it's not trying to time the market or trade frequently, which is
probably why they give a certain allowance of these, but it just seems
silly to be required to have downtime in between selling one security and
picking another just because of potential market timing, even between
different fund families.

--
Phil
Flasherly
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:22 pm
Guest
On Jul 8, 12:06 am, "Phil" <n...@try.to> wrote:
Quote:

"Futher, in order to prevent excessive trading activity, the Funds limit the
number of 'round trip' transactions that a shareholder may make. A
shareholder makes a round trip by purchasing shares of a particular Fund
(through either a purchase or exchange from another Fund) and subsequently
selling shares of that Fund (through either a redumption or an exchange into
another Fund)."

Are the funds in reference to selling a fund and then buying another one *in
the same fund family?* Or is this just in general? I'm using Scottrade and
simply can't see TCW knowing if I bought a fund from another family through
Scottrade or if they communicate this through some other means.

Obviously, round-tripping only a couple times a year is no big deal because
it's not trying to time the market or trade frequently, which is probably
why they give a certain allowance of these, but it just seems silly to be
required to have downtime in between selling one security and picking
another just because of potential market timing, even between different fund
families.

--
Phil

I know something about that. Both, and, in general, in reference to
the cite. Never had a local Scottrade representative call your house
specifically to make a threat ... I have. The same veiled ambiguity
used to word a threat to frequent traders before applying the written
contractual terms a prospectus delineates. No ... it may not be just a
couple times a year. Until the prospectus is read and understood, or
someone is responsibly able to explain any particularities relating to
contractual obligations, what it then lacks is precise meaning. I was
recently penalized for selling real estate funds I didn't keep for a
full year. Funds do, or not, penalize frequent traders. Funds set
services and conditions according to what the market will, or not,
bear. Funds, I also know, ban frequent traders from ever again doing
business with them - 'through either a purchase or exchange from
another, or any, Fund and subsequently selling shares of that Fund
through either a redemption or an exchange into another, or any,
Fund.' As it were, the bottom line for all funds to read is biased
towards their own interests. Fund preservation means good investors
that hang on to fund money are good investors because good investors
make funds money. (A relative thing from the investor standpoint,
being somebody will, even if nobody gets into the business to fail).

It is comforting to reflect that the disproportion of things in the
world seems to be only arithmetical. -Franz Kafka
Andrew Koenig
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:22 pm
Guest
"Phil" <nice@try.to> wrote in message
news:469062b9$0$24737$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

Quote:
"Futher, in order to prevent excessive trading activity, the Funds limit
the number of 'round trip' transactions that a shareholder may make. A
shareholder makes a round trip by purchasing shares of a particular Fund
(through either a purchase or exchange from another Fund) and subsequently
selling shares of that Fund (through either a redumption or an exchange
into another Fund)."

Are the funds in reference to selling a fund and then buying another one
*in the same fund family?* Or is this just in general? I'm using
Scottrade and simply can't see TCW knowing if I bought a fund from another
family through Scottrade or if they communicate this through some other
means.

I would think that when they say "shares of that Fund," they mean the same
fund, not just a similar one.

What I wonder is whether this policy prohibits you from selling a fund after
you've bought it too many times. Interpreted literally, it would seem to do
that, because it limits the number of round trips, and a transaction doesn't
become a round trip until you sell.
Andrew Koenig
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:22 pm
Guest
"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4690cb86$0$12232$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

Quote:
Fidelity defines it as selling within 30 days of a purchase. They "slap
your wrists" for 1 to 2 within a year, but freeze your entire account for
3 within a rolling year. The thing that "bugs" me about the policy is
that they count it on a last in first out basis. In other words, if one
has say 100K in fund X for 10 years and buys say another 5K and then sells
say 10K within 30 days of the 5K purchase, it's counted as a round trip
trade.

Vanguard has what seems like a simpler and more sensible policy:

If you sell shares in a fund, you are prohibited from buying shares in that
same fund (in that same account) by phone or web for 60 days. You can buy
shares in the same fund in a different account (so, for example, if you sell
shares in a traditional IRA, you can still buy shares in the same fund in a
taxable account or a Roth IRA without restriction). You can also buy shares
in the same account, provided that you do so by US Mail. Of course, that
introduces a random delay in the process, which automatically makes frequent
trading that much harder.

But unlike the other policies described here, Vanguard never prohibits you
from selling shares for any reason.

Now, of course some funds do impose a fee if you sell within a particular
time limit. My understanding is that they comput the fee on a first-in
first-out basis. So, for example, if a fund imposes a 1% fee if you sell
within a year, and you have $10,000 in the fund that has been there more
than a year, you can buy any number of shares and immediately sell shares
worth up to $10,000 without penalty. You will still have to wait 60 days
before you can buy more shares in the fund (unless you do so by mail), but
you won't be charged for selling shares as the shares you sold are deemed to
have been the oldest ones.
Mark Freeland
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:22 pm
Guest
"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4690cb86$0$12232$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote:
The thing that "bugs" me about the policy is that they count it on a last
in first out basis. In other words, if one has say 100K in fund X for 10
years and buys say another 5K and then sells say 10K within 30 days of the
5K purchase, it's counted as a round trip trade.

Same as the IRS. See "wash sale".

Mark Freeland
BnetOnewsX@sbcglobal.net
Jerry
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:46 am
Guest
In the case of Fidelity it's the same fund. One can buy the next day after
a sale. It's just that one should hold for 30 days after a buy. One can
have unlimited sales as long as there are no buys in the last 30 days.

Jerry
"Andrew Koenig" <ark@acm.org> wrote in message
news:sH6ki.156693$Sa4.123474@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Quote:
"Phil" <nice@try.to> wrote in message
news:469062b9$0$24737$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

"Futher, in order to prevent excessive trading activity, the Funds limit
the number of 'round trip' transactions that a shareholder may make. A
shareholder makes a round trip by purchasing shares of a particular Fund
(through either a purchase or exchange from another Fund) and
subsequently selling shares of that Fund (through either a redumption or
an exchange into another Fund)."

Are the funds in reference to selling a fund and then buying another one
*in the same fund family?* Or is this just in general? I'm using
Scottrade and simply can't see TCW knowing if I bought a fund from
another family through Scottrade or if they communicate this through some
other means.

I would think that when they say "shares of that Fund," they mean the same
fund, not just a similar one.

What I wonder is whether this policy prohibits you from selling a fund
after you've bought it too many times. Interpreted literally, it would
seem to do that, because it limits the number of round trips, and a
transaction doesn't become a round trip until you sell.

Dave C.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:17 am
Guest
"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4690cb86$0$12232$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote:
Fidelity defines it as selling within 30 days of a purchase. They "slap
your wrists" for 1 to 2 within a year, but freeze your entire account for
3 within a rolling year. The thing that "bugs" me about the policy is
that they count it on a last in first out basis. In other words, if one
has say 100K in fund X for 10 years and buys say another 5K and then sells
say 10K within 30 days of the 5K purchase, it's counted as a round trip
trade.

Jerry

I did a round trip within 29 days at the beginning of this year when I

removed some shares to balance my funds. I usually do this two or three
times a year. So, I counted 30 days. But I counted the days wrong, and I
think may have something to do with the settling time.

I got the wrist slap and a 90 day freeze. Being not aware of round trips, I
talked to Fidelity and he clarified the rules. I was going to ask to lift
the freeze, bit since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go.

Dave C.
Ed
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:38 am
Guest
"Dave C." <myaddress@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:LLmdnU-UfJdVFQjbnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Quote:

"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4690cb86$0$12232$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Fidelity defines it as selling within 30 days of a purchase. They "slap
your wrists" for 1 to 2 within a year, but freeze your entire account for
3 within a rolling year. The thing that "bugs" me about the policy is
that they count it on a last in first out basis. In other words, if one
has say 100K in fund X for 10 years and buys say another 5K and then
sells say 10K within 30 days of the 5K purchase, it's counted as a round
trip trade.

Jerry

I did a round trip within 29 days at the beginning of this year when I
removed some shares to balance my funds. I usually do this two or three
times a year. So, I counted 30 days. But I counted the days wrong, and I
think may have something to do with the settling time.

I got the wrist slap and a 90 day freeze. Being not aware of round trips,
I talked to Fidelity and he clarified the rules. I was going to ask to
lift the freeze, bit since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go.

"since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go"
You lost me with this statement.

ETF's are index funds.
No freezes.
No early redemption fees.
No minimums.
Trade all day instead of end of day.
Dave C.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:19 pm
Guest
"Ed" <friday@fishinthe.net> wrote in message
news:xTkli.3454$Y_3.2760@trnddc04...
Quote:
I got the wrist slap and a 90 day freeze. Being not aware of round trips,
I talked to Fidelity and he clarified the rules. I was going to ask to
lift the freeze, bit since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go.

"since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go"
You lost me with this statement.

ETF's are index funds.
No freezes.
No early redemption fees.
No minimums.
Trade all day instead of end of day.

This is the Extended Market Index FSVEX, vs., say, a Select fund and not to

volatile. This was a low priority item and I did not feel any pressure to
have to make a change. I usually review and do a re-balance maybe once a
quarter depending on the market.

I wanted to sell about 10% of the shares to take some of the appreciation
off the top. ETF's would be a good option.

Dave C.
Jerry
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:35 pm
Guest
I do use some ETFs because of this. I also use some similar funds within
Fidelity and keep one of em above the 30 day rule. This allows me to move
mostly into cash should I wish. Fidelity does have some funds which
outperform their ETF peers.

Jerry
"Ed" <friday@fishinthe.net> wrote in message
news:xTkli.3454$Y_3.2760@trnddc04...
Quote:

"Dave C." <myaddress@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:LLmdnU-UfJdVFQjbnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@comcast.com...

"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4690cb86$0$12232$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Fidelity defines it as selling within 30 days of a purchase. They "slap
your wrists" for 1 to 2 within a year, but freeze your entire account
for 3 within a rolling year. The thing that "bugs" me about the policy
is that they count it on a last in first out basis. In other words, if
one has say 100K in fund X for 10 years and buys say another 5K and then
sells say 10K within 30 days of the 5K purchase, it's counted as a round
trip trade.

Jerry

I did a round trip within 29 days at the beginning of this year when I
removed some shares to balance my funds. I usually do this two or three
times a year. So, I counted 30 days. But I counted the days wrong, and
I think may have something to do with the settling time.

I got the wrist slap and a 90 day freeze. Being not aware of round trips,
I talked to Fidelity and he clarified the rules. I was going to ask to
lift the freeze, bit since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go.

"since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go"
You lost me with this statement.

ETF's are index funds.
No freezes.
No early redemption fees.
No minimums.
Trade all day instead of end of day.


Ed
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:34 pm
Guest
"Dave C." <myaddress@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:Qo-dnW8DWsfonQvbnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@comcast.com...
Quote:

"Ed" <friday@fishinthe.net> wrote in message
news:xTkli.3454$Y_3.2760@trnddc04...
I got the wrist slap and a 90 day freeze. Being not aware of round
trips, I talked to Fidelity and he clarified the rules. I was going to
ask to lift the freeze, bit since it was in a index fund I figured to
let it go.

"since it was in a index fund I figured to let it go"
You lost me with this statement.

ETF's are index funds.
No freezes.
No early redemption fees.
No minimums.
Trade all day instead of end of day.

This is the Extended Market Index FSVEX, vs., say, a Select fund and not
to volatile. This was a low priority item and I did not feel any pressure
to have to make a change. I usually review and do a re-balance maybe once
a quarter depending on the market.

FSVEX is not a good symbol. You must mean FSEVX.
If so, it has no record so we'll use Vanguard, the standard deviation is
11.32 vs 10.65 for the category. The fund has had several single quarter
returns of between -16% and -21%. There are less volatile Select funds.

Quote:
I wanted to sell about 10% of the shares to take some of the appreciation
off the top. ETF's would be a good option.

Dave C.

ETF's are a great option, freedom to do as you please.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT
The time now is Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:54 am