Navigation: Main Page » Forum
 
Web Investingadvisers.com
Finance & Stock Groups Forum Index  »  Financial Planning  »  taxable vs. tax-exempt in a roth ira
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Pete
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:13 pm
Guest
just double checking but isn't it correct that if one has funds in a vanguard taxable
money-market (ie. VMMXX) fund in a roth ira, since there are no taxes if held 5 years
and after 59.5 years, it makes no difference versus a tax-exempt money-market (ie.
VMSXX) ?

since this is in a roth ira, there's no issue about the tax either way, so it's only a
matter of better return in one money-market account versus the other?

or is there something else to be aware of?
Justin
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:18 pm
Guest
Pete wrote on [Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:13:59 -0500]:
Quote:
or is there something else to be aware of?

Not really.
PeterL
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:02 pm
Guest
On Jun 27, 5:13 am, "Pete" <p...@te.cn> wrote:
Quote:
just double checking but isn't it correct that if one has funds in a vanguard taxable
money-market (ie. VMMXX) fund in a roth ira, since there are no taxes if held 5 years
and after 59.5 years, it makes no difference versus a tax-exempt money-market (ie.
VMSXX) ?

since this is in a roth ira, there's no issue about the tax either way, so it's only a
matter of better return in one money-market account versus the other?

or is there something else to be aware of?


Don't hold any tax advantaged investment in a tax advantaged account.
This is true of either Roth IRA or regular IRA. In a Roth you will
not be taxed with you withdraw your funds for retirement. In a
regular IRA funds from a taxable MMF or a tax exempt MMF will both be
taxed the same way.
Tad Borek
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:02 pm
Guest
Pete wrote:
Quote:
just double checking but isn't it correct that if one has funds in a
vanguard taxable money-market (ie. VMMXX) fund in a roth ira, since
there are no taxes if held 5 years and after 59.5 years, it makes no
difference versus a tax-exempt money-market (ie. VMSXX) ?

Pete-
As someone else already posted, you should never hold a tax-exempt
investment (such as a municipal bond, or a tax-exempt municipal
money-market fund) within a Roth IRA.

"Tax exempt" means that the interest you receive each year isn't taxable
on your federal or state tax return. But all interest earned from the
investments in a Roth IRA is free from tax, regardless of what type of
investment it comes from. And whether a Roth IRA withdrawal is taxed or
not has nothing to do with the source of the income within the IRA --
it's based only on the rules for Roth distributions.

So there's no benefit to earning tax-exempt interest within a Roth, and
in fact there' a penalty...tax-exempt rates are always lower than
taxable rates, so you should to for the higher-interest (taxable)
alternatives.

-Tad
rick++
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:02 pm
Guest
Quote:
Don't hold any tax advantaged investment in a tax advantaged account.
This is true of either Roth IRA or regular IRA.

If it had a higher return than a taxabIe investment I would.
However nearly all of the tax advantaged investments I am aware
pay out less as a taxable investment for the same asset class.
catalpa
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:30 am
Guest
"rick++" <rick303@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182969437.179269.175350@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Quote:

Don't hold any tax advantaged investment in a tax advantaged account.
This is true of either Roth IRA or regular IRA.

If it had a higher return than a taxabIe investment I would.
However nearly all of the tax advantaged investments I am aware
pay out less as a taxable investment for the same asset class.


Be very careful about only focusing on returns. If a tax advantaged
investment has a higher return than a taxable investment in the same asset
class it has a much higher risk. High risk investments don't belong in an
IRA.
Will Trice
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:17 am
Guest
catalpa wrote:
Quote:

High risk investments don't belong in an
IRA.


Why not? While it makes sense that you may not want to put a
tax-advantaged investment into a tax-advantaged account, I'm sure there
are many non-tax-advantaged mutual funds, not to mention individual
securities, with the same risk as your hypothetical high-return,
tax-advantaged investment. I would guess that these are still
appropriate for IRAs.

-Will
kastnna
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:13 pm
Guest
On Jun 27, 4:30 pm, "catalpa" <cata...@entertab.org> wrote:
Quote:
High risk investments don't belong in an IRA.

I don't follow, please explain. Are you suggesting that mid and small-
cap value investments should not go into a tax advantaged account
also?

I can see how one might want to put high risk investments in a taxable
account so that the losses can be realized, but then so are the gains.
I'm being a bit dense today, please clarify.

Thanks
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT
The time now is Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:06 am